Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bibliometric analysis reveals a paradigm shift from sensor monitoring toward predictive AI in construction safety, highlighting a transition to proactive risk management.
This study maps the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven risk management and safety research in construction through a bibliometric and science-mapping review of Scopus-indexed journal articles published between 2000 and 2025. From 398 records, screening yielded 272 English-language documents and 177 final journal articles. Performance analysis used Microsoft Excel, OpenRefine, and biblioMagika, while science mapping used the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer, supported by manual verification of AI-assisted synthesis. The study integrates performance indicators, network analysis, thematic validation, and gap-oriented interpretation to extend previous bibliometric research on occupational safety and health. Results show a shift from early sensor-based monitoring towards predictive analytics, computer vision, wearable systems, digital twins, conversational AI, and autonomous inspection. Seven clusters were identified: AI safety frameworks; predictive analytics and risk modelling; real-time monitoring and machine safety; worker health monitoring; socio-technical and ethical AI; AI-based safety training and virtual environments; and autonomous inspection. The findings emphasise a transition from reactive practices to proactive, data-driven safety management. Overall, the review provides a structured framework for advancing safer, smarter, and more resilient construction operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: