Theoretical analysis demonstrates three-dimensional spatial closure and emergent quantum structures from relational pair dynamics, suggesting physical dimensions arise from algebraic return...
This preprint develops the Complementary Relational Principle (CRP) and its mathematical realization as Complementary Relational Dynamics (CRD). The foundational proposal treats a standalone physical zero not as a primitive state but as a possible cancellation, balance, projection, or limiting readout of nonzero relational structure. Continuous oriented norm-preserving exchange on a real complementary pair yields a complex structure. With additional Hilbert-space, symmetry, and measurement assumptions, the framework is connected conditionally to Schrödinger evolution, Born weights, tensor composition, generalized measurements, decoherence, pointer records, Bell–CHSH correlations, and canonical uncertainty. A relation-preserving compression hierarchy distinguishes reversible global-phase compression from irreversible diagonal coarse graining. The central spatial result is independent of these quantum extensions. Every bilinear alternating relation of two one-forms factors through their wedge product. Requiring a nonzero, orientation-preserving-isometry-natural return to the same one-form type, without an additional primitive tensor, selects three dimensions, where the return is a scalar multiple of the Hodge star. A gauge-covariant pair-to-space bridge and a candidate feedback equation yield a falsifiable self-generated holonomy signature. Stereopsis and two-path interference illustrate the shared input–relation–readout architecture, while Fermat arithmetic is retained only as a separate boundary comparison. The conclusions are explicitly conditional: the paper does not claim to derive quantum mechanics or the dimensionality of physical space from the CRP alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshida (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: