Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis reveals the role of receptive and projective identification in early human development, highlighting their relevance for understanding communicative functioning and...
The author’s aims in this paper are twofold. The first aim is to consider the psychoanalytic concept of identification. What kind of concept or group of concepts is this; in which respects is it radical in reconfiguring psychological theory; and how far might we separate notions of receptive and projective identification? The author’s second aim is to pursue the implications for understanding human development and psychopathology. The author illustrates how relatively neglected forms of identification play pivotal roles at different levels of communicative functioning, as well as shape seemingly disparate domains of early development—a story that is both informed by, and may inform, current psychoanalytic theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. Peter Hobson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: