What does this research mean for the field?

There is substantial heterogeneity and no single standardized model for implementing or evaluating Total Worker Health (TWH) approaches across occupational settings, highlighting a need for more consistent reporting to improve comparability and reproducibility. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To systematically map and describe the implementation and evaluation methodologies applied within Total Worker Health (TWH) initiatives across diverse occupational settings.

September 6, 2026Hygiene0 citationsOpen Access

Implementation and Evaluation Methods of Total Worker Health Approaches

A Scoping Review on Implementation and Evaluation Methods of Total Worker Health® Approaches

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

CZCarolina Zellino ASAndrea Spinazzè FBFrancesca Borghi

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Scoping review uncovers substantial methodological heterogeneity across occupational settings, highlighting the need for standardized reporting in Total Worker Health initiatives.

Key Points

To systematically map and describe the implementation and evaluation methodologies applied within Total Worker Health (TWH) initiatives across diverse occupational settings.
Searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in January 2023 and updated the search in July 2026 for peer-reviewed English articles addressing TWH implementation, application, assessment, or evaluation.
Identified and fully charted 60 studies in the initial search using descriptive frequency tables, alongside eight additional studies identified in the updated search evaluated across core methodological domains.
Observed wide heterogeneity across occupational sectors, study objectives, intervention components, evaluation tools, and reporting formats.
Identified surveys, questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, meetings, training sessions, and mixed-methods frameworks as the predominant tools for intervention evaluation.
Found no standardized implementation or evaluation model, showing that uniform reporting of processes, populations, and analytical strategies is needed to ensure comparability and transferability.

Cite This Study

Zellino et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9d1ec828139818eab21e2e https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene6030058

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

September 6, 2026Hygiene0 citationsOpen Access

Implementation and Evaluation Methods of Total Worker Health Approaches

A Scoping Review on Implementation and Evaluation Methods of Total Worker Health® Approaches

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

CZCarolina Zellino ASAndrea Spinazzè FBFrancesca Borghi

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Scoping review uncovers substantial methodological heterogeneity across occupational settings, highlighting the need for standardized reporting in Total Worker Health initiatives.

Key Points

To systematically map and describe the implementation and evaluation methodologies applied within Total Worker Health (TWH) initiatives across diverse occupational settings.
Searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in January 2023 and updated the search in July 2026 for peer-reviewed English articles addressing TWH implementation, application, assessment, or evaluation.
Identified and fully charted 60 studies in the initial search using descriptive frequency tables, alongside eight additional studies identified in the updated search evaluated across core methodological domains.
Observed wide heterogeneity across occupational sectors, study objectives, intervention components, evaluation tools, and reporting formats.
Identified surveys, questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, meetings, training sessions, and mixed-methods frameworks as the predominant tools for intervention evaluation.
Found no standardized implementation or evaluation model, showing that uniform reporting of processes, populations, and analytical strategies is needed to ensure comparability and transferability.

Cite This Study

Zellino et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9d1ec828139818eab21e2e https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene6030058

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark