Key result
Discontinuing RAS inhibitors in advanced CKD is linked to ~102% greater MACE risk vs continuation.
Why the study?
Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are often discontinued in advanced chronic kidney disease to limit adverse effects or delay kidney replacement therapy, despite being key for cardiovascular and kidney risk modification.
Does discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors increase major cardiovascular events and kidney replacement therapy initiation in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=1,434)
Does discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors increase major cardiovascular events and kidney replacement therapy initiation in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease?
In patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, discontinuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is associated with a significantly increased risk of major cardiovascular events and kidney replacement therapy initiation compared to continuing therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support continuing RAS inhibitors in advanced CKD; extends observational data but leaves causal effects open pending RCTs.
Background Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are a cornerstone of cardiovascular and kidney risk modification in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Yet, they are often discontinued in advanced CKD to limit adverse effects or to delay kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Methods From the CKD-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network prospective cohort study, we selected participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m2 and treated with RAS inhibitors. We performed a target trial emulation with parametric g-formula to compare two strategies: to discontinue or to continue RAS inhibitors. Models were adjusted for sociodemographics, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and drug prescriptions. Outcomes were the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for heart failure, i.e. major cardiovascular events (MACE), and KRT initiation. Results Among the 1 434 patients included (median age 68 years, median eGFR 25 mL/min/1.73m2, 35% women), 386 (27%) discontinued RAS inhibitors over a median follow-up of 35 months. Very few events related to adverse drug reactions were reported in the 3 months preceding RAS inhibitor discontinuation (n = 23), but their incidence over this period was ∼13-fold higher than that during the entire follow-up. The 3-year adjusted relative risk of MACE associated to discontinuing RAS inhibitors, compared to continuing, was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.62 to 2.47), and that of KRT initiation, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.60). Discussion RAS inhibitor discontinuation was strongly associated with MACE and KRT risks, major causes of morbidity and mortality in advanced CKD. Our findings, consistent with prior data, suggest the risk-benefit balance favors continued use with close monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maisons et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in advanced chronic kidney disease (n=1,434). Discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors vs. Continuing RAS inhibitors was evaluated on composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for heart failure (MACE) (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.62-2.47). Discontinuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in advanced CKD was associated with a higher 3-year risk of major cardiovascular events compared to continuing therapy (RR 2.02; 95% CI 1.62-2.47).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: