Geostatistical assessment reveals extensive disturbance of overlying geothermal aquifers during deep coal extraction, indicating the need for modified mining techniques.
While traditional mine hydrogeology focuses on preventing water inrush to protect underground workings, this study establishes a novel evaluation framework aimed at protecting valuable, high-temperature geothermal water resources during deep coal extraction in coal–water dual-resource mines. We selected seven key indicator factors to quantify the disturbance intensity of mining to the overlying geothermal reservoir aquifer, and applied fuzzy variable set theory to evaluate the disturbance level and delineate disturbance zones to investigate the Tongzhe Coalfield area in the eastern Henan Plain of China. The results show that zones of stronger disturbance associated with the extraction of the main coal seam are concentrated in the northern, northeastern, and southwestern parts of the study area. Area statistics indicate that high disturbance zones account for 5.0% of the study area, relatively high disturbance zones for 30.6%, moderate disturbance zones for 32.6%, relatively low disturbance zones for 22.1%, and low disturbance zones for 9.7%. In total, zones at moderate disturbance or above represent 68.2%, suggesting that appropriate mining methods are required during extraction of the main coal seam to mitigate mining induced disturbance to the roof geothermal aquifer. These results provide a scientific basis for selecting mining practices that protect water resources in coal–water dual-resource mining areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: