Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study reveals mixed model fit for the BPAQ-SF in incarcerated adults, suggesting cautious clinical use.
The Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire–Short Form (BPAQ-SF) is a widely used self-report tool designed to assess aggression. However, evidence on its psychometric properties among Spanish-speaking incarcerated individuals remains limited. This study examines the factor structure and psychometric performance of the Spanish version of the BPAQ-SF among male and female individuals incarcerated in six Spanish prisons. The original four-factor structure (Verbal Aggression, Physical Aggression, Hostility, and Anger) showed acceptable fit according to scaled indices, but poor fit based on robust indices. A three-factor model combining Verbal Aggression and Anger improved internal consistency (α = .80, ω = .82 for the combined factor) and parsimony, although model fit issues persisted. Overall, the findings provide mixed support for the Spanish version of the BPAQ-SF. While the three-factor structure appears more psychometrically defensible, users should be aware of limitations related to item performance and model fit, particularly when relying on robust indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aizpurúa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: