Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The nature of the interaction between the inner and outer regions of turbulent wall-bounded flow is examined. Townsend's theory of inactive motion is shown to be a first-order, linear approximation of the effect of the large eddies at the surface that acts as a quasi-inviscid, low-frequency modulation of the shear-stress-bearing motion. This is shown to be a 'strong' asymptotic condition that directly expresses the decoupling of the inner-scale active motion from the outer-scale inactive motion. It is further shown that such a decoupling of the inner and outer vorticity fields near the wall is inappropriate, even at high Reynolds numbers, and that a 'weak' asymptotic condition is required to represent the increasing effect of outer-scale influences as the Reynolds number increases. High Reynolds number data from a fully developed pipe flow and the atmospheric surface layer are used to show that the large-scale motion penetrates to the wall, the inner-outer interaction is not describable as a linear process and the interaction should more generally be accepted as an intrinsically nonlinear one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. F. Morrison (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: