Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report demonstrates a dural-based cystic cavernoma in a young adult, highlighting diagnostic challenges when vascular malformations mimic atypical cysts.
BACKGROUND: Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are benign vascular lesions most commonly found within the brain parenchyma. Extra-axial and dural-based cavernomas are exceedingly rare, and cystic variants are even less frequently described. Their radiological appearance may mimic more common extra-axial lesions, posing a potential diagnostic challenge. We report a unique case of a dural-based cavernoma presenting as a giant extra-axial cyst with recurrent haemorrhage rhage, and we review the relevant literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 30-year-old woman was followed for a decade for a large left fronto-temporal extra-axial cyst, initially discovered incidentally. Serial MRI scans demonstrated a slowly enlarging cyst with high T2/FLAIR signal, low-intermediate T1 signal, and mild peripheral enhancement. Later follow-up imaging revealed an interval haemorrhage rhage within the cyst. She subsequently presented with a transient episode of dysphasia and right-hand numbness. CT confirmed acute bleeding into and around the cyst with mild mass effect. She soon underwent an elective fronto-temporal craniotomy. Intraoperatively, a thick-walled cyst with multiple septations was evacuated, and a dural-based vascular lesion near the temporal base was excised. Histopathology confirmed a cavernous malformation with haemorrhage rhage, hemosiderin deposition, and chronic inflammation. Postoperatively, she recovered rapidly without complications. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates a rare presentation of a dural-based cystic cavernoma mimicking an atypical extra-axial cyst. The absence of classic CCM imaging features, together with cystic morphology and mild wall enhancement, contributed to the diagnostic complexity. Dural-based cavernomas should be included in the differential diagnosis of giant extra-axial cysts that do not follow CSF intensity on all MRI sequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: