Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
a subtle comment on the amalgam of assumptions and guesswork which she strives to expose that she never gives us very clearly the criteria by which we can judge this real rehabilitation.The vocational criterion-return to gainful employment-she rejects as too narrow.Not all readers will accept that we know as little about the rehabilitation of the disabled as Constantina Safilios- Rothschild insists, nor will they want to postpone change and experiment until they have the answer to even a fraction of the research questions she poses.Nevertheless they will gain insight from reading what she has to say.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. S. Weiner (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: