This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with co-existent emphysema, termed combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) may be associated with reduced FVC decline compared to non-CPFE IPF patients. We examined associations between mortality and functional measures of disease progression in two IPF cohorts. Methods Visual emphysema extent (CPFE:non-CPFE: derivation cohort=317:183; replication cohort=358:152), scored on computed tomography imaging subgrouped CPFE patients using either a) 10%, or b) 15% visual emphysema threshold, or c) an unsupervised machine learning model considering emphysema and ILD extents. Baseline characteristics, 1-year forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) decline (linear mixed effects models), and their associations with mortality (multivariable Cox regression models) were compared across CPFE and non-CPFE subgroups. Results In both IPF cohorts, CPFE patients with >10% emphysema had a greater smoking history and lower baseline DLco compared to CPFE patients with <10% emphysema. Using multivariable Cox regression analyses in patients with >10% emphysema, 1-year DLco decline was a better indicator of mortality than 1-year FVC decline. Results were maintained in patients suitable for therapeutic IPF trials. Results were replicated in the >15% emphysema population and using unsupervised machine learning. Importantly, the unsupervised machine learning approach identified CPFE patients in whom FVC decline did not associate strongly with mortality. In non-CPFE IPF patients, 1-year FVC declines >5% and >10% showed comparable mortality associations. Conclusion When assessing disease progression in IPF, DLco decline should be considered in patients with >10% emphysema and a >5% 1-year FVC decline threshold considered in non-CPFE IPF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: