Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents two robust microtransfer printing methods, namely, multiple transfer printing and peeling microprinting methods, to fabricate three-dimensional (3-D) and high-aspect-ratio microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) structures over large areas on flexible polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates. These techniques enable conformal wrapping of 3-D microstructures, initially fabricated in two-dimensional (2-D) layouts with standard fabrication technology onto a wide range of surfaces with complex and curvilinear shapes. The processes exploit the differential adhesive tendencies of the microstructures formed between a donor and a transfer substrate to accomplish an efficient release and transfer process. Experimental and theoretical studies show that the MEMS structures with a wide variety of pattern densities can be conformally transferred to bendable device substrates while keeping the structural integrity and density intact. Quantitative stress analysis on the micromechanics of such a curvilinear system suggests that the stress induced by wrapping the complete structure onto a cylinder is mostly in the flexible PDMS substrate, while the MEMS structures experience little stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: