Key result
An optimized dimeric compound targeting the toxic r(CUG) repeat expansion showed 10-fold enhanced potency in vitro and 5-fold enhanced potency in DM1-patient-derived myotubes.
Why the study?
RNA is an important therapeutic target, but the discovery and optimization of small molecules interacting with structured disease-causing RNAs is challenging.
Massively parallel optimization of a small molecule linker domain yielded a compound with significantly enhanced potency against the toxic RNA repeat expansion causing myotonic dystrophy type 1.
RNA contributes to disease pathobiology and is an important therapeutic target. The downstream biology of disease-causing RNAs can be short-circuited with small molecules that recognize structured regions. The discovery and optimization of small molecules interacting with RNA is, however, challenging. Herein, we demonstrate a massively parallel one-bead-one-compound methodology, employed to optimize the linker region of a dimeric compound that binds the toxic r(CUG) repeat expansion [r(CUG) exp ] causative of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Indeed, affinity selection on a 331,776-member library allowed the discovery of a compound with enhanced potency both in vitro (10-fold) and in DM1-patient-derived myotubes (5-fold). Molecular dynamics simulations revealed additional interactions between the optimized linker and the RNA, resulting in ca. 10 kcal/mol lower binding free energy. The compound was conjugated to a cleavage module, which directly cleaved the transcript harboring the r(CUG) exp and alleviated disease-associated defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vézina‐Dawod et al. (2021) studied myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). optimized dimeric compound targeting r(CUG) repeat expansion was evaluated on potency in vitro and in DM1-patient-derived myotubes. An optimized dimeric compound targeting the toxic r(CUG) repeat expansion showed 10-fold enhanced potency in vitro and 5-fold enhanced potency in DM1-patient-derived myotubes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: