Key result
Advances in cardiology and their escalating costs to patients are evaluated by the government under the principle that the health of nations is more important than financial constraints.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Government policy favors health over cardiology costs; leaves open rigorous value assessments before practice change.
THE HEALTH of nations is more important than
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenfant et al. (1985) studied this question. Advances in cardiology and their escalating costs to patients are evaluated by the government under the principle that the health of nations is more important than financial constraints.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: