Key result
Total atrioventricular nodal ablation increased the development of persistent AF (4.5% vs 45.5%, P<0.05) and AF burden (3.0 vs up to 11.8 hours/day, P<0.05) despite antiarrhythmic drugs.
Why the study?
Does total atrioventricular nodal ablation increase atrial fibrillation burden in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation despite continuation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy?
Cohort (n=22)
Does total atrioventricular nodal ablation increase atrial fibrillation burden in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation despite continuation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy?
Total atrioventricular nodal ablation increases atrial fibrillation burden and promotes the development of persistent AF in patients with paroxysmal AF, even when antiarrhythmic drugs are continued.
AV nodal ablation was associated with higher AF burden and progression despite AAD; leaves open causality and need for randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Total atrioventricular nodal (TAVN) ablation and pacing is an accepted and safe treatment for patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Many patients develop permanent AF within the first 6 months after TAVN ablation. This usually is ascribed to the cessation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy. We hypothesized that TAVN ablation itself creates an atrial substrate prone to AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients participating in the Atrial Pacing Periablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PA3) study who remained on stable antiarrhythmic drug therapy throughout follow-up were included in this analysis. AF burden and the development of persistent AF in the preablation period were compared to two consecutive postablation periods. Echocardiographic changes also were evaluated. Twenty-two patients remained on stable drug therapy (9 men and 13 women, age 59 +/- 3 years). One patient developed persistent AF preablation compared to 10 postablation (P < 0.05). AF burden preablation was 3.0 +/- 1.2 hours/day and increased to 10.4 +/- 2.2 hours/day and 11.8 +/- 2.3 hours/day in the two postablation follow-up periods (P < 0.05). In patients with fractional shortening (FS) >30% prior to ablation, FS decreased significantly from 39.4% +/- 1.3% to 36.4%+/- 1.7% (P < 0.05). In contrast, in patients with a FS < or =30% prior to ablation, FS increased from 27% +/- 0.8% to 33.6 +/- 1.7% (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TAVN ablation increases AF burden and facilitates the development of persistent AF in patients with paroxysmal AF despite the continuation of antiarrhythmic drugs. Loss of AV and/or interventricular synchrony may lead to altered cardiac hemodynamics resulting in atrial stretch and increasing AF burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willems et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (n=22). Total atrioventricular nodal (TAVN) ablation vs. Preablation period was evaluated on Development of persistent AF (p=<0.05). Total atrioventricular nodal ablation increased the development of persistent AF (4.5% vs 45.5%, P<0.05) and AF burden (3.0 vs up to 11.8 hours/day, P<0.05) despite antiarrhythmic drugs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: