GreenLight HPS laser 120‐W versus diode laser 200‐W vaporization of the prostate: Comparative clinical experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We present our clinical experiences of two recently introduced vaporization laser systems: the GreenLight High Performance System (HPS) laser (532 nm, 120 W) and the Diolas LFD diode laser (980 nm, 200 W). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two laser systems were evaluated to compare their clinical results for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients were treated using either the GreenLight HPS laser (n = 84) or the diode laser (n = 55) in a prospective randomized study. The data of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)), post-void residual urine (PVR), and quality of life score (Qols) were recorded at baseline, 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. The prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. All complications were also recorded. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in IPSS, Q(max), PVR, and QoLs in each laser group at the 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups compared with baseline. There was no statistical significant difference in any of these parameters at any follow-up interval between each group. The diode laser demonstrates superior hemostatic properties compared with the GreenLight HPS laser. Postoperative incontinence and postoperative irritative symptoms are more pronounced (P < 0.05) after diode laser prostatectomy. Higher incidence of dysuria with sloughing tissues and epididymitis (P < 0.05) is noted after diode laser prostatectomy. Other complications were comparable for both procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Although both lasers can improve subjective and objective parameters of BPH, both can produce undesired effects. The search for the ideal vaporization laser to treat BPH still continues.