Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The title electron acceptor, bis[ 1,2,5] thiadiazolotetracyanoquinodimethane (BTDA, 1), formed weak electrondonor-acceptor (EDA) complexes with arylolefins such as styrene (ST) and divinylbenzenes (DVs). Upon chargetransfer (CT) excitation of these complexes in MeCN, the [2 + 2]-type cycloadducts (2) were formed via a single transfer. Similar cycloaddition reactions were efficiently induced when the solid-state molecular complexes 1 and arylolefins were irradiated. In contrast to the close similarities in solution photochemistry, the solid-state of three isomeric divinylbenzenes (oDV, mDV, pDV) were quite dissimilar because of the different molecular of 1 and DVs in the crystal. The apparent reactivity of the oDV- crystal was much higher than that in solution in the case of the ST-1 crystal, and adduct 2o was formed via the single crystal-to-single crystal transformation. of the asymmetric crystal structure in oDV- , the optically pure product with 95% ee was obtained from the components without any external chiral source. On the other hand, the incomplete conversion of the mDV-1 to 2m is due to the crystal-to-amorphous transformation, and the 1:2 adduct 6 was formed on irradiation of pDV-1 crystal which could not be obtained on excitation of the EDA complex in MeCN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: