Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper describes experimental observations of electron-beam—plasma amplification in a low-pressure, beam-produced, mercury-vapor discharge. A nonperturbing probing technique, employing a fine auxiliary electron beam, was used to measure rf growth, phase velocity, and axial and radial electric-field profiles in the interaction region. The comprehensive data obtained have been compared with predictions based on cold- and warm-plasma theories of beam—plasma amplification. It is concluded that the experimental growth rates and electric-field profiles are approached more closely by warm-plasma theory, but that the measured phase velocities are somewhat slower than either theory suggests. The electric-field profiles are smoother than expected, probably owing to the beam boundary being less sharp in practice than is assumed in the theories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cannara et al. (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: