Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two heterobimetallic complexes of [Fc(4-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ](PF 6 ) 2 ( 1 ) and [Fc(3-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ](PF 6 ) 2 ( 2 ) (Fc(4-Py) = 4-ferrocenylpyridine, Fc(3-Py) = 3-ferrocenylpyridine) have been synthesized and characterized for the purpose of investigating optical and thermal electron transfer. The mixed-valence species generated in situ using ferrocenium hexafluorophosphate as the oxidant show Robin and Day class II behavior, and the oxidized sites are ruthenium centered. Δ E 1/2 °, E 1/2 °(Fe III /Fe II ) − E 1/2 °(Ru III /Ru II ), an estimate of Δ E o that is an energetic difference between the donor and acceptor sites, changes sharply with variation of solvents. Good linear relationship exists between Δ E 1/2 ° and Gutmann solvent donor number (DN) and Δ E 1/2 ° versus DN plots yield a slope of 20.4 ± 1.6 mV/DN for [Fc(4-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ] 2+/3+/4+ and a slope of 21.1 ± 2.2 mV/DN for [Fc(3-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ] 2+/3+/4+ . The solvent-dependent IT bands were found to vary almost exclusively with Δ E 1/2 °. The continuum dielectric approximation is found to be adequate, and the ( E op − Δ E o ) versus (1/ε op − 1/ε s ) plot yields a straight line with a slope of 3848 ± 1444 and an intercept of 4265 ± 227 cm - 1 for [Fc(4-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ] 3+ . The corresponding values for [Fc(3-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ] 3+ are 2328 ± 1560 and 6712 ± 100 cm - 1 . The thermal electron transfer (the reverse of the optical process, viz., Ru II → Fe III electron transfer) is adiabatic for [Fc(4-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ] 3+ but somewhat nonadiabatic (κ ≈ 0.6) for [Fc(3-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ] 3+ . The thermal transfer rate constants of both complexes decrease exponentially with increasing solvent donor number and show close magnitude in all solvents despite [Fc(3-Py)Ru(NH 3 ) 5 ] 3+ having apparently a shorter through-space distance and lower activation energies. However, these calculated k th values should be used with caution because no experimental data as measured by flash photolysis techniques are available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: