Key result
Avian cells variably restrict CpG-high RNA viruses and cannot restrict UpA-high mutants unlike mammalian lines.
Why the study?
It was proposed that ZAP recognises RNA virus sequences with elevated CpG dinucleotides and shapes host cytoplasmic mRNA compositions, especially interferons and IFN-stimulated genes, to avoid self-recognition.
Host variability in ZAP-mediated restriction of CpG- and UpA-enriched RNA viruses does not appear to shape the dinucleotide compositions of highly expressed antiviral genes.
No immediate clinical relevance for antiviral design; leaves open ZAP's evolutionary role in mammalian gene composition.
The ability of zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP) to recognise and respond to RNA virus sequences with elevated frequencies of CpG dinucleotides has been proposed as a functional part of the vertebrate innate immune antiviral response. It has been further proposed that ZAP activity shapes compositions of cytoplasmic mRNA sequences to avoid self-recognition, particularly mRNAs for interferons (IFNs) and IFN-stimulated genes highly expressed when ZAP is upregulated during the antiviral state. We investigated the ZAP functional activity in different species of mammals and birds, and potential downstream effects of differences in CpG and UpA dinucleotide representations in host transcriptomes and in RNA viruses that infect them. Cell lines from different bird orders showed variability in restriction of influenza A virus and echovirus 7 replicons with elevated CpG frequencies and none restricted UpA-high mutants, in marked contrast to mammalian cell lines. Given this variability, we compared CpG and UpA representation in coding regions of ISGs and IFNs with the total cellular transcriptome to determine whether differences in ZAP activity shaped dinucleotide compositions of highly expressed genes during the antiviral state. While type 1 IFN genes typically showed often profound suppression of CpG and UpA frequencies, there was no over-suppression of CpGs or UpAs in ISGs in any species, irrespective of underlying ZAP activity. Similarly, mammalian and avian RNA virus genome sequences were compositionally equivalent as were IAV serotypes recovered from ducks, chickens and humans. Overall, we found no evidence for host variability in ZAP function impacting compositions of antiviral genes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odon et al. (2021) studied RNA virus infection. CpG and UpA dinucleotide enrichment in viral genomes vs. Wild-type viral sequences was evaluated on Viral replication (luciferase activity or viral titer). Avian cell lines showed variability in restricting RNA viruses with elevated CpG frequencies and none restricted UpA-high mutants, in contrast to mammalian cell lines, with no evidence that host variability in ZAP function impacts antiviral gene composition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: