Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reactions between cationic metal–ligand fragments and salts of the anionic complexes [2,2,2-(CO)3-2-PPh3-closo-2,1-MoCB10H11]− and [2,2-(CO)2-2-L-closo-2,1-FeCB10H11]− (L = CO or PPh3) have afforded a range of zwitterionic compounds in which an electrophilic [ML′n]+ group is attached to the cage system in an exopolyhedral manner by one, two, or three agostic B–H⇀ML′n bonds. The bimetal compounds isolated do not have direct metal–metal bonds, a feature confirmed by X-ray diffraction for [2,2,2-(CO)3-2-PPh3-7,8,12-(μ-H)3-7,8,12-{Cu(PPh3)}-closo-2,1-MoCB10H8], [2,2,2-(CO)3-2-PPh3-7,12-(μ-H)2-7,12-{Ag(PPh3)}-closo-2,1-MoCB10H9], [2,2,2-(CO)3-2-PPh3-7,8,12-(μ-H)3-7,8,12-{RuCl(PPh3)2}-closo-2,1-MoCB10H8] and [2,2,2-(CO)3-2-PPh3-12-(μ-H)-12-{Fe(CO)2(η-C5Me5)}-closo-2,1-MoCB10H10]. The penultimate compound displays in solution complicated dynamic behaviour, in part due to the presence of a number of diastereomeric pairs of enantiomers. Low temperature 31P-{1H} NMR data have helped elucidate these processes for the isomers observed for this complex. The NMR data (1H, 13C, 11B, and 31P) for the new compounds are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellis et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: