The hypothesis which explains the diastereoselectivity of the 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition of the N‐glycosylnitrones 1–3 leading to the 5,5‐disubstituted isoxazolidines 4–6 on the basis of a kinetic anomeric effect predicts that nucleophiles should add to N‐glycosylnitrones with a high degree of diastereoselectivity. To test this prediction, the nucleophilic addition of lithium and potassium dialkylphosphites to the crystalline (Z)‐nitrone 11, prepared from oxime 9 and (benzyloxy)acetaldehyde has been examined. The addition of lithium phosphites gave the N‐glycosyl‐N‐hydroxyaminophosphonates 12–16 (d. e. 78–92%) in high yields (Scheme 4). The addition of potassium phosphites showed a much lower diastereoselectivity. Glycoside cleavage, hydrogenolysis, and dealkylation of 12–16 gave (+)‐(S)‐phosphoserine (+)‐19 (34–45% from 9). Its absolute configuration was confirmed by an X‐ray analysis of the N‐(3,3,3‐trifluoro‐2‐methoxy‐2‐phenylpropionyl) derivative 24. Similarly, the crystalline nitrone 25 gave the N‐glycosyl‐N‐hydroxyaminophosphonate 26, which was transformed into (+)‐(S)‐phosphovaline (+)‐31 (42% from 9). The diastereoselectivity of the nucleophilic addition and the enantiomeric purity of (+)‐31 were determined by the analysis of the derivative 30 (d.e. 92%) and 32 (d.e. 93%), respectively. The addition of lithium diethyl phosphite to the nitrone 33, prepared in situ, gave the N‐glycosyl‐N‐hydroxyaminophosphonate 34, (41%; d.e. 91%), which was transformed in (+)‐(S)‐phosphoalanine (+)‐37 (21% from 9).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huber et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: