Key result
Stroke patients receiving post-discharge ambulatory rehabilitation had a significantly higher risk of 90-day mortality compared to those receiving no services, even after adjusting for admission health status (HR 2.69).
Why the study?
Few studies have examined post-discharge ambulatory care for stroke patients and subsequent readmission and mortality rates to identify high-risk groups for follow-up planning.
Does post-discharge ambulatory follow-up (GP, home nursing, rehabilitation) reduce readmissions and mortality in stroke patients discharged home?
Cohort (n=4,727)
Does post-discharge ambulatory follow-up (GP, home nursing, rehabilitation) reduce readmissions and mortality in stroke patients discharged home?
Observed differences in readmission and mortality rates according to GP follow-up and home nursing were largely due to differences in health status at admission, highlighting the importance of risk adjustment in observational studies of post-discharge care.
Does not support withholding ambulatory rehabilitation; leaves open residual confounding in observational post-stroke outcomes research.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have focused on post-discharge ambulatory care for stroke patients and subsequent differences in readmission and mortality rates. Identifying groups at higher risk according to services received is important when planning post-discharge follow-up in ambulatory care. According to a recent Whitepaper by the Norwegian Government, patients receiving ambulatory care should have follow-up with a general practitioner (GP) within 14 days of hospital discharge. METHODS: All home discharged stroke cases occurring in Oslo from 2009 to 2014 were included. 90- and 365-day all-cause readmissions and mortality were compared separately for patients categorized based on services received (no services, home nursing, ambulatory rehabilitation and home nursing with ambulatory rehabilitation) and early GP follow-up within 14 days following discharge. Variables used to adjust for differences in health status and demographics at admission included inpatient days and comorbidities the year prior to admission, calendar year, sex, age, income, education and functional score. Cox regression reporting hazard ratios (HR) was used. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in readmission rates for early GP follow-up. Patients receiving home nursing and/or rehabilitation had higher unadjusted 90- and 365-day readmission rates than those without services (HR from 1.87 to 2.63 depending on analysis, p < 0.001), but the 90-day differences disappeared after risk adjustment, except for patients receiving only rehabilitation. There were no significant differences in mortality rates according to GP follow-up after risk adjustment. Patients receiving rehabilitation had higher mortality than those without services, even after adjustment (HR from 2.20 to 2.69, p < 0.001), whereas the mortality of patients receiving only home nursing did not differ from those without services. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the observed differences in unadjusted readmission and mortality rates according to GP follow-up and home nursing were largely due to differences in health status at admission, likely unrelated to the stroke. On the other hand, mortality for patients receiving ambulatory rehabilitation was twice as high compared to those without, even after adjustment and irrespective of also receiving home nursing. Hence, assessing the needs of these patients during discharge planning and providing careful follow-up after discharge seems important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swanson et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Stroke (n=4,727). Ambulatory rehabilitation vs. No services was evaluated on 90-day all-cause mortality (HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.80-4.03, p=<0.001). Stroke patients receiving post-discharge ambulatory rehabilitation had a significantly higher risk of 90-day mortality compared to those receiving no services, even after adjusting for admission health status (HR 2.69).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: