Key result
In minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, the endoaortic clamp was associated with a 9.3% rate of intraoperative complications compared to 2% with the external aortic clamp.
Why the study?
Does the external aortic clamp technique reduce intraoperative complications and improve myocardial protection compared to the endoaortic clamp in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
Cohort (n=139)
Does the external aortic clamp technique reduce intraoperative complications and improve myocardial protection compared to the endoaortic clamp in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.3% vs 2%
The external aortic clamp technique appears safer and provides better myocardial protection than the endoaortic clamp during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.
External clamp may reduce complications in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: : This study was carried out with the aim of presenting our experience with minimally invasive mitral surgery and compare the endoaortic clamp with the external aortic clamp (EAC) techniques. METHODS: : Between December 2002 and May 2009, 139 patients (75 men, aged 63 ± 11 years) underwent video-assisted mitral valve surgery through right thoracotomy. Twelve (9%) patients were operated without clamping the aorta, 32 (23%) patients (group A) were operated on by using the endoaortic clamp, and 95 (68%) patients were operated on by using the EAC (group B). There was no significant difference between groups A and B regarding preoperative variables. RESULTS: : Intraoperative procedure-associated problems were experienced in three group A patients (9.3%, two aortic dissections with conversion to sternotomy; one conversion due to bad exposure) and in two group B patients (2%, one conversion to sternotomy for bleeding and one for ascending aorta hematoma). At a mean follow-up of 32 months, 121 patients (97%) were in New York Heart Association class I-II, with satisfactory echocardiographic results. There was one in-hospital and six late deaths (three noncardiac, two cardiac, and one valve related). Five-year actuarial survival was 88% ± 8%. There were three reoperations, one early (<30 days) after complex mitral valve repair, with a 5-year freedom from reoperation of 97% ± 2%. Postoperative levels of myocardial cytonecrosis enzymes as well as the extracorporeal circulation time were significantly lower in group B patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: : Intraoperative procedure-associated complications with endoclamping combined with an apparently better myocardial protection forced us to change our practice to the more simple and economic EAC technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ius et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve disease requiring surgery (n=139). Endoaortic clamp vs. External aortic clamp (EAC) was evaluated on Intraoperative procedure-associated problems. In minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, the endoaortic clamp was associated with a 9.3% rate of intraoperative complications compared to 2% with the external aortic clamp.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: