Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a novel intervention for bedtime problems. DESIGN: We used an ABAB withdrawal-type experimental design. SETTING: The intervention was prescribed in an outpatient primary health care context and evaluated in the home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Two normally developing boys aged 3 and 10 years were the primary participants. Twenty parents and 23 practicing pediatricians rated the acceptability of the intervention. INTERVENTION: A bedtime pass, exchangeable for 1 excused departure from the bedroom after bedtime. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For both primary participants, instances of crying and/or coming out from the bedroom after bedtime; for the 20 parents and 23 pediatricians, comparative ratings of acceptability for the pass and 2 other commonly used approaches to bedtime problems (ignoring crying and letting children sleep with their parents). RESULTS: Crying and coming out from the bedroom reduced to zero rates in both children. Pediatricians rated using the pass as significantly more acceptable than letting children sleep with parents and equivalent to ignoring. Parents rated the pass as more acceptable than either alternative. CONCLUSION: The bedtime pass provides pediatricians with a readily usable, potentially effective, and highly acceptable novel intervention for bedtime problems, one of the most common complaints in outpatient pediatrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Friman et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: