Key result
Body roundness index strongly predicts metabolic syndrome, with high diagnostic accuracy around an AUC of ~0.90.
Why the study?
What is the optimal cutoff point for the body roundness index to predict metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults?
Cross-Sectional
What is the optimal cutoff point for the body roundness index to predict metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults?
The body roundness index demonstrates high discriminatory power for predicting metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults, with specific cutoff points identified for men and women.
This study aimed to establish cutoff points for the body roundness index as a predictor of metabolic syndrome in a Brazilian adult population. This population-based cross-sectional study was conducted with data from a subsample of laboratory tests from the 2013 National Health Survey. The adult population aged 18-59 years was considered. To determine the cutoff point for the body roundness index according to the risk classification for metabolic syndrome, high waist circumference and the presence of three other risk components according to international criteria were used. An analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to analyze the specificity and sensitivity. The cutoff points for both sexes were similar, resulting in a cutoff point for women of 3.757 (AUC: 0.833), with a sensitivity of 90.7% and a specificity of 63.0%, whereas for men, the cutoff point was 3.965 (AUC: 0.906), with a sensitivity of 93.1% and specificity of 76.4%. The body roundness index has great discriminatory power for predicting metabolic syndrome in the Brazilian population and can be incorporated into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prado et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome. Body roundness index was evaluated on Metabolic syndrome (AUC 0.833 (women), AUC 0.906 (men)). The body roundness index effectively predicted metabolic syndrome, with optimal cutoff points of 3.757 for women (AUC 0.833) and 3.965 for men (AUC 0.906).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: