Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The neutral and the lowest cationic (singlet and triplet) potential-energy surfaces of [Si, P, H2] have been explored by means of ab initio MO calculations at the G2 level of theory as well as the hybrid DFT (B3LYP/6-311G**) method. Contrary to the neutral and triplet surfaces, where the H2SiP+/0 isomers represent the global minima, for the singlet cation a doubly bridged P(H)2Si+ structure has been identified as the most stable isomer, with the non-bridged H2SiP+ species being significantly less stable (ΔE = 31.7 kcal mol−1 at G2). As far as the comparison of the two quantum-chemical methods (i.e. G2 and B3LYP) is concerned, the calculated relative energies ΔE are quite close to each other, with deviations smaller than 4 kcal mol−1. However, while the non-bridged SiPH2+ (1A′) represents a minimum at the G2 level, it could not be located using the hybrid DFT method. The computationally predicted singlet and triplet [Si, P, H2]+ potential-energy surfaces provide insight into the course of the ion/molecule reactions of Si+• with phosphine and P+ with silane, respectively, which were examined experimentally. Thus, the reaction of the doublet species Si+• with phosphine allows access to the non-classical, bridged P(H)2Si+ structure, while in the reaction of the P+ triplet cation with silane, no evidence for Si–P bond formation is obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hrušák et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: