The aim of this study was to qualitatively demonstrate surface micro-morphological changes after the employment of different surface conditioning methods on high-alumina and glassy-matrix dental ceramics. Three disc-shaped high-alumina specimens (In-Ceram Alumina, INC) and 4 glassy-matrix ceramic specimens (Vitadur Alpha, V) (diameter: 5 mm and height: 5 mm) were manufactured. INC specimens were submitted to 3 different surface conditioning methods: INC1--Polishing with silicon carbide papers (SiC); INC2--Chairside air-borne particle abrasion (50 microm Al2O3); INC3 - Chairside silica coating (CoJet; 30 microm SiOx). Vitadur Alpha (V) specimens were subjected to 4 different surface conditioning methods: V1--Polishing with SiC papers; V2 - HF acid etching; V3--Chairside air-borne particle abrasion (50 microm Al2O3); V4--Chairside silica coating (30 microm SiOx). Following completion of the surface conditioning methods, the specimens were analyzed using SEM. After polishing with SiC, the surfaces of V specimens remained relatively smooth while those of INC exhibited topographic irregularities. Chairside air-abrasion with either aluminum oxide or silica particles produced retentive patterns on both INC and V specimens, with smoother patterns observed after silica coating. V specimens etched with HF presented a highly porous surface. Chairside tribochemical silica coating resulted in smoother surfaces with particles embedded on the surface even after air-blasting. Surface conditioning using air-borne particle abrasion with either 50 microm alumina or 30 microm silica particles exhibited qualitatively comparable rough surfaces for both INC and V. HF acid gel created the most micro-retentive surface for the glassy-matrix ceramic tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bottino et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: