Key result
Echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization increased median cardiac output from 3.2 to 5.7 L/min and allowed discontinuation of all inotropes and vasopressors within 12 hours.
Why the study?
Does echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization improve cardiac output and reduce catecholamine requirements in critically ill patients with refractory cardiogenic shock?
Observational (n=8)
No
Does echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization improve cardiac output and reduce catecholamine requirements in critically ill patients with refractory cardiogenic shock?
Echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization significantly improved hemodynamics and allowed for rapid discontinuation of catecholamines in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid weaning from catecholamines in refractory shock; hypothesis-generating from one case and requires prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Inotropic and vasopressor drugs are routinely used in critically ill patients to maintain adequate blood pressure and cardiac output in patients with cardiogenic shock although potentially at the expense of increasing myocardial oxygen demand. Pacing optimization has been demonstrated as effective in reducing catecholamine requirements in patients with chronic heart failure by improving cardiac efficiency; however, there are no reports relating to the effectiveness of pacemaker optimization on cardiac output in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock in the intensive care. DATA SOURCES: Retrospective data analysis. STUDY SELECTION: Twenty-bed adult tertiary cardiothoracic ICU, university hospital. DATA EXTRACTION: Eight sequential patients receiving dual chamber pacemaker with DDD modality with cardiogenic shock and hemodynamic instability refractory to catecholamines underwent echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization of cardiac output. An iterative method with Doppler echocardiography was used to assess changes in cardiac output, left ventricular filling time, ejection time, total isovolumic time, mitral regurgitation, ejection fraction, and blood pressure at different increments of heart rate, and atrioventricular and interventricular delay. All results are shown as median (minimum/maximum level) or mean ± SD. DATA SYNTHESIS: Using echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization on cardiac output, the cardiac output increased from 3.2 (2.3/3.8) to 5.7 L/min (4.85/7.1) and cardiac index from 1.64 (1.1/1.9) to 2.68 L/min/m (2.1/3.2) and the total isovolumic time reduced from 22.8 to normal values (<14). In association, the glomerular filtration rate increased significantly except in one patient with stage IV chronic kidney disease. All inotropes and vasopressors were discontinued within 12 hours of pacemaker optimization on cardiac output, and all patients were discharged from the ICU within 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization of cardiac output is a feasible bedside therapeutic option, which should be considered when standard medical treatments are insufficient for the treatment of cardiogenic shock refractory to inotropic support, thereby minimizing the detrimental effect of catecholamines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tavazzi et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Cardiogenic shock (n=8). Echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization vs. Baseline (pre-optimization) was evaluated on Cardiac output. Echocardiography-guided pacemaker optimization increased median cardiac output from 3.2 to 5.7 L/min and allowed discontinuation of all inotropes and vasopressors within 12 hours.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: