Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Energy transfer experiments are carried out at dilute concentrations of donors (10−4 M, coumarine 334) and acceptors (5×10−6 M, sulforhodamine 101) in a levitated microdroplet (diameter, 2a=19 μm), using an aerosol particle fluorescence microscope. Microphotographs in donor and acceptor luminescence show that the transfer mechanism is not of a Förster type, but is mediated by morphology dependent resonances (MDRs) of the microdroplet. The transfer is vanishingly small in the central region of the droplet (r<0.9a), and grows to a pronounced maximum beneath the surface (active region), consistent with the theory of MDR-enhanced energy transfer. The angular intensity profile of the acceptor image, along with current theory, suggests that the energy transfer is a maximum with the donor and acceptor at equal distances on opposite sides of the droplet center, ∼18 μm apart. From photometry we measure an overall ratio of acceptor to total luminescence of 7%. Within the active region the transfer efficiency is above 50%. This yield is ∼1000× that expected from Förster transfer. This effect may be understood from a modification in the photon density of states in this region, which leads to efficient photon emission into MDRs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnold et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: