Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EGFR-TKIs are effective therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR-activating mutations. However, responses vary within individuals and resistant disease inevitably emerges. A prospective cohort of 130 patients with advanced EGFR mutation NSCLC were enrolled. Pre-and post-treatment plasma from subjects treated with EGFR-TKIs were obtained. The correlation between EGFR mutation abundance using the Idylla™ ctEGFR mutation assay, radiographic assessment, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Eighty-nine patients with retrieved blood collection were analyzed. Undetectable ctEGFR (49.5%), detectable ctEGFR CqMut-high (23.5%), and detectable ctEGFR CqMut low (27%) using CqMut cutoff at 28.1, represented consecutive incremental tumor burden by radiographic assessment and outcome of treatment. Median PFS was 13.4 months [95% CI 12.0-14.8] in undetectable ctEGFR, 10.4 months [95% CI 9.9-10.9] in ctEGFR CqMut-high, and 5.9 months [95% CI 3.8-7.4] in ctEGFR CqMut-low. Number of metastasis sites > 3 was found in 22.7%, 23.8%, and 58.3% of the 3-tier ctEGFR tumor burden levels, respectively (p-value 0.01). Presence of liver metastasis was significantly correlated with number of metastasis sites > 3 and ctEGFR CqMut-low (45.8%). Liver metastasis was an independent factor of reduced PFS and OS by multivariate analysis with an HR = 2.41 [95% CI 1.27-4.60, p-value 0.007]) and HR = 2.96 [95% CI 1.35-6.51, p-value 0.007], respectively. The pretreatment ctEGFR detection using the Idylla™ ctEGFR mutation assay served as a surrogate marker for tumor abundance and tumor burden. Presence of liver metastasis was found to be a clinical predictor associated with high tumor abundance and worsening treatment outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sitthideatphaiboon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: