In this study, the formation processes of CO 2 and carbonates during CO oxidation over Ir-in-CeO 2 and Ir-on-CeO 2 catalysts at 40 °C were compared. An in situ pulse calorimetry, in combination with H 2 -TPR, Raman, DRIFTS, and adsorption microcalorimetry techniques, was used to reveal the effect of structural differences of these two catalysts on the adsorption and catalytic performances for CO oxidation. It was found that encapsulating Ir in CeO 2 greatly weakened the Ce–O bond strength on Ir-in-CeO 2 . This led to the formation of more oxygen vacancy sites, promoting the accumulation of carbonates. Comparatively, supporting Ir on CeO 2 showed a higher Ce–O bond strength and less oxygen vacancy sites on Ir-on-CeO 2 but exposed more surface accessible Ir sites, which favored the CO adsorption. During CO oxidation, more oxygen vacancy sites on Ir-in-CeO 2 resulted in the formation of carbonates with 0.06 monolayers coverage initially before the production of CO 2, whereas surface Ir sites on Ir-on-CeO 2 facilitated the adsorbed CO reacting with the oxygen species to directly produce CO 2 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: