ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTEnvironmental AnalysisCarolyn J. Koester, Staci L. Simonich, and Bradley K. EsserView Author Information Analytical and Nuclear Chemistry Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551-0808 Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology and Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-7301 Analytical and Nuclear Chemistry Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551-0808 Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 12, 2813–2829Publication Date (Web):May 3, 2003Publication History Published online3 May 2003Published inissue 1 June 2003https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac030131thttps://doi.org/10.1021/ac030131treview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2003 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views2349Altmetric-Citations65LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Chromatography,Extraction,Geological materials,Impurities,Organic compounds Get e-Alerts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koester et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: