Key result
A machine learning algorithm using 16 features discriminated oxidative stress status with an AUC of 0.949 (95% CI 0.925-0.974), sensitivity of 0.923, and specificity of 0.855.
Why the study?
Oxidative stress accelerates lifestyle-related chronic diseases, but knowledge and practices to quantify oxidative stress remain lacking.
Can a machine learning algorithm accurately predict oxidative stress status in healthy adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,328)
No
Can a machine learning algorithm accurately predict oxidative stress status in healthy adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A machine learning algorithm using 16 features can accurately predict oxidative stress status in healthy adults, potentially aiding in precision nutrition and prevention of lifestyle-related chronic diseases.
Oxidative stress aggravates the progression of lifestyle-related chronic diseases. However, knowledge and practices that enable quantifying oxidative stress are still lacking. Here, we performed a proof-of-concept study to predict the oxidative stress status in a healthy population using retrospective cohort data from Boramae medical center in Korea (n = 1328). To obtain binary performance measures, we selected healthy controls versus oxidative disease cases based on the “health space” statistical methodology. We then developed a machine learning algorithm for discrimination of oxidative stress status using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)/elastic net regression with 10-fold cross-validation. A proposed fine-tune model included 16 features out of the full spectrum of diverse and complex data. The predictive performance was externally evaluated by generating receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve of 0.949 (CI 0.925 to 0.974), sensitivity of 0.923 (CI 0.879 to 0.967), and specificity of 0.855 (CI 0.795 to 0.915). Moreover, the discrimination power was confirmed by applying the proposed diagnostic model to the full dataset consisting of subjects with various degrees of oxidative stress. The results provide a feasible approach for stratifying the oxidative stress risks in the healthy population and selecting appropriate strategies for individual subjects toward implementing data-driven precision nutrition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Oxidative stress (n=1,328). Machine learning algorithm (LASSO/elastic net regression) was evaluated on Discrimination of oxidative stress status (AUC 0.949, 95% CI 0.925 to 0.974). A machine learning algorithm using 16 features discriminated oxidative stress status with an AUC of 0.949 (95% CI 0.925-0.974), sensitivity of 0.923, and specificity of 0.855.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: