The four-dimensional model Hamiltonian of Wang and Perry [J. Chem. Phys. 109, 10795 (1998)] is used to compare the approximate adiabatic separation of the torsion and CH stretches in methanol to an exact solution of the same Hamiltonian. The adiabatic approximation accounts for the pattern of the energy levels in the lowest torsional states, including the inverted tunneling splittings, but does not account for the pattern of systematic two- and four-fold near degeneracies at high torsional excitation. In the adiabatic basis, the nonadiabatic couplings mix the torsional and vibrational degrees of freedom and hence are a source for intramolecular vibrational redistribution (IVR). These IVR matrix elements are found to decrease by only a factor of 2 or 3 with each higher coupling order, in agreement with the results of Pearman and Gruebele [Z. Phys. Chem. Munich 214, 1439 (2000)]. This gentle scaling behavior, which contrasts with a steeper falloff with coupling order in more rigid molecules, points to a more important role for direct high-order couplings in torsional molecules. In this model, the scaling behavior derives from a single coupling term that is low order in the torsional angular momentum in combination with one-dimensional torsional functions that include contributions from many torsional angular momenta.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clasp et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: