Key result
When diagnostic testing errors are accounted for using a Bayesian method, the optimal group size for Potato virus Y testing becomes smaller compared to error-free testing assumptions.
Adjusting for diagnostic classification errors using a Bayesian approach results in smaller optimal group sizes for pooled testing of Potato virus Y, minimizing overall costs.
In many areas of the world, Potato virus Y (PVY) is one of the most economically important disease problems in seed potatoes. In Taiwan, generation 2 (G2) class certified seed potatoes are required by law to be free of detectable levels of PVY. To meet this standard, it is necessary to perform accurate tests at a reasonable cost. We used a two-stage testing design involving group testing which was performed in Taiwan's Seed Improvement and Propagation Station to identify plants infected with PVY. At the first stage of this two-stage testing design, plants are tested in groups. The second stage involves no retesting for negative test groups and exhaustive testing of all constituent individual samples from positive test groups. In order to minimise costs while meeting government standards, it is imperative to estimate optimal group size. However, because of limited test accuracy, classification errors for diagnostic tests are inevitable; to get a more accurate estimate, it is necessary to adjust for these errors. Therefore, this paper describes an analysis of diagnostic test data in which specimens are grouped for batched testing to offset costs. The optimal batch size is determined by various cost parameters as well as test sensitivity, specificity and disease prevalence. Here, the Bayesian method is employed to deal with uncertainty in these parameters. Moreover, we developed a computer program to determine optimal group size for PVY tests such that the expected cost is minimised even when using imperfect diagnostic tests of pooled samples. Results from this research show that, compared with error free testing, when the presence of diagnostic testing errors is taken into account, the optimal group size becomes smaller. Higher diagnostic testing costs, lower costs of false negatives or smaller prevalence can all lead to a larger optimal group size. Regarding the effects of sensitivity and specificity, optimal group size increases as sensitivity increases; however, specificity has little effect on determining optimal group size. From our simulated study, it is apparent that the Bayesian method can truly update the prior information to more closely approximate the intrinsic characteristics of the parameters of interest. We believe that the results of this study will be useful in the implementation of seed potato certification programmes, particularly those which require zero tolerance for quarantine diseases in certified tubers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2011) studied Potato virus Y (PVY) infection in seed potatoes. Two-stage group testing design with Bayesian method vs. Error-free testing assumptions was evaluated on Optimal group size and expected cost. When diagnostic testing errors are accounted for using a Bayesian method, the optimal group size for Potato virus Y testing becomes smaller compared to error-free testing assumptions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: