Invasive aliens and sampling bias

Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the observation of increased vigour of invasive alien plants in their nonindigenous ranges: phenotypic plasticity, and the post‐invasion evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA). Here I specify how a general pattern of increased vigour may result from sampling bias. Ignoring failed invasions can account for the illusion of increased vigour over a broad range of assumptions. Plasticity and EICA need not be viewed as explanations for a general pattern of increased vigour even if they are the mechanisms underlying every occurrence.