The use of porphyrins in fundamental studies and diverse applications requires facile access to ample quantities of material in pure form. The existing conditions for the condensation of a dipyrromethane plus a dipyrromethane−dicarbinol employ 2.5 mM reactants and afford ∼30% yields with no detectable scrambling. Large-scale syntheses require condensation and oxidation conditions that function at higher concentrations. Thirty-one acids (plus additives) have been examined for reactions at 25 mM reactants using the synthesis of a trans -A 2 B 2 -porphyrin as a model. The porphyrin was formed in ∼20% yield upon condensation in CH 2 Cl 2 at room temperature using (1) Sc(OTf) 3 (3.2 mM) + 2,6-di- tert -butylpyridine (32 mM), or (2) Zn(OTf) 2 (10 mM). Nine porphyrins were prepared in this manner in yields of 15−22% with no detectable scrambling, whereas three other porphyrins afforded low levels of scrambling and/or lower yields (8−14%). Conditions for the oxidation also have been investigated. The reaction of 5-mesityldipyrromethane and the dicarbinol derived from 1-(4-methoxybenzoyl)-9-(4-methylbenzoyl)-5-phenyldipyrromethane (18 mmol each in 720 mL of CH 2 Cl 2; 25 mM) with catalysis by Sc(OTf) 3 /2,6-di- tert -butylpyridine and aerobic oxidation [( t -Bu 4 FePc) 2 O and DDQ, 2.5 mol % each with a stream of O 2 ] afforded 2.88 g (22.8% yield) of the corresponding ABCD-porphyrin. The present synthesis (25 mM), at 4.5-times larger scale than the largest prior analogous synthesis (2.5 mM reactants with stoichiometric use of DDQ), afforded 4.0 times as much porphyrin on a molar basis while employing about one-half the amount of solvent and < 1 / 25 the amount of DDQ. A three-step one-flask process also was developed that employs (i) condensation at 25 mM reactants, (ii) aerobic oxidation, and (iii) metal insertion to afford the metalloporphyrin [Mg(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Pd(II)] in a streamlined manner. Taken together, the various improvements facilitate gram-scale syntheses of diverse porphyrins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaidi et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: