Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical study reveals potent cytotoxicity and lower myelotoxicity for MEN 10710 in resistant tumor models, indicating its potential as an improved distamycin derivative.
MEN 10710 is a new synthetic distamycin derivative possessing four pyrrole rings and a bis-(2-chloroethyl)aminophenyl moiety linked to the oligopyrrole backbone by a flexible butanamido chain. Its biological properties have been investigated in comparison with the structurally related compound, tallimustine (FCE24517), and the classical alkylating agent, melphalan (L-PAM). Cytotoxic potency of MEN 10710 was increased from 10- to 100-fold, as compared to tallimustine or L-PAM in murine L1210, human LoVo and MCF7 tumor cell lines. MEN 10710 was still active against L1210/L-PAM leukemic cells, while a partial cross-resistance was observed in LoVo/DX and in MCF7/DX cells selected for resistance to doxorubicin and expressing a MDR phenotype. Treatment with verapamil (VRP) reduced the resistance to tallimustine, but not to MEN 10710, in MCF7/DX cells. The cytotoxic effects reflect in vivo antitumor potency and toxicity in the treatment of human tumor xenografts. MEN 10710 was more effective in A2780/DDP, an ovarian carcinoma selected for resistance to cisplatin. On the other hand, the IC30 for inhibiting murine granulocyte/macrophage colony formation was 50 times higher for MEN 10710 than for tallimustine, suggesting a lower myelotoxic potential. In conclusion, the particular biological profile of MEN 10710 characterized by a marked cytotoxic potency, an interesting antitumor efficacy and a reduced in vitro myelosuppressive action may represent a further improvement in the rational design of a novel distamycin-related alkylating compound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bigioni et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: