A divergent selection experiment for serum IGF-I concentration began at the Eastern Ohio Resource Development Center in 1989 using 100 spring-calving (50 high line and 50 low line) and 100 fall-calving (50 high line and 50 low line) purebred Angus cows. Following weaning, bull and heifer calves were fed in drylot for a 140-d period. Real-time ultrasound measurements of backfat thickness and longissimus muscle area were taken on d 56 and 140 of the postweaning test. Only ultrasound data from calves born from fall 1995 through spring 1999 were included in the analysis. At the time of this study, IGF-I measurements were available for 1,521 bull and heifer calves, and ultrasound data were available for 636 bull and heifer calves. Data were analyzed by multiple-trait, derivative-free, restricted maximum likelihood methods. Estimates of direct heritability for IGF-I concentration at d 28, 42, and 56 of the postweaning period, and for mean IGF-I concentration were 0.26 +/- 0.07, 0.32 +/- 0.08, 0.26 +/- 0.07, and 0.32 +/- 0.08, respectively. Direct heritabilities for ultrasound estimates of backfat thickness ranged from 0.17 +/- 0.11 to 0.28 +/- 0.12, whereas direct heritabilities for longissimus muscle area ranged from 0.20 +/- 0.10 to 0.36 +/- 0.12, depending on the time of measurement and the covariate used for adjustment (age vs. weight). Direct genetic correlations of IGF-I concentrations with backfat thickness at d 56 and 140 and with longissiumus muscle area at d 56 and 140 averaged 0.02, 0.20, -0.08, and 0.23, respectively, when age was used as the covariate for both IGF-I and ultrasound measurements. Corresponding genetic correlations when age was used as the covariate for IGF-I and weight was used as the covariate for ultrasound measurements were 0.05, -0.07, -0.22, and -0.04, respectively. Therefore, the positive associations of serum IGF-I concentration with backfat thickness and longissimus muscle area at d 140 seem to have been partially mediated by weight. Results of this study do not indicate strong associations of serum IGF-I concentration with fat thickness or muscling of bulls and heifers during the postweaning feedlot period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: