Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During three years, 39,924 infants born consecutively in the area covered by our registry of congenital malformations were surveyed; 775 had major congenital malformations. Recurrence risks for the major malformation was estimated and classified as high (greater than 10%, 5.3% of the cases), low (1 to 10%, 85.3% of the cases) or occasional (less than 1%, 9.4% of the malformed). Feasibility of prenatal diagnosis was considered. On the basis of the recurrence risk of 1% or higher and the feasibility of prenatal diagnosis, such a procedure should be considered in future pregnancies in 64.1% of the mothers. Genetic counseling has to be given to couples at risk of having a malformed child. For this purpose, as is shown in our study, the best way is the possibility of using a registry of congenital malformations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stoll et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: