Eight hundred and fifty soybean accessions were screened for genotypes with electrophoretic variations of the β-conglycinin and glycinin subunits. We detected two abnormal SDS-gel electrophoretic forms of β-conglycinin α-subunit, the slow electrophoretic mobility type designated as α-slow-type and the low α-subunit content type designated as α-low-type. Each of these two forms was controlled by a codominant allele at a single locus. The gene symbol Cgy2a was assigned to the common type and Cgy2b to the α-slow-type. We found a new electrophoretic form of β-conglycinin β-subunit designated as β'-subunit which migrates slightly faster than the β-subunit on SDS-gels. Beta-prime (β') subunit was controlled by a single dominant gene designated as Cgy3. The homozygous recessive cgy3 cgy3 lacked the β'-subunit. We observed two variations of the glycinin group-I acidic subunits (A1, A2 and A3) by alkaline urea electrophoresis, i. e., the concomitantly slow and fast electrophoretic mobility types designated as A(I)-slow-type and A(I)-fast-type, respectively. The concomitantly slow and fast migrating Al'A2 and A3 subunits, respectively, behaved in the F2 seeds as a single block composed 'of the three electrophoretic bands. Each of these electrophoretic forms was inherited as if controlled by a codominant allele at a single locus. The gene symbols, Gyla, Gylb and, Gylc were assigned to the alleles for the common electrophoretic type, the A(I)-slow-type and the A(I)-fast-type, respectively. Close linkage was found between Cgy2 and Cgy3. The gene Cgy1 controlling the β-conglycinin α'-subunit was independent of Gy1 and Gy4 which controls the A5 subunit and its associated basic subunit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsukada et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: