We studied the interactions of the substitution‐inert inversion‐labile complexes Fe(bipy) and Fe(phen) [and the inversion‐stable complex Ru(bipy) ] with DNA. The association of these complexes to DNA is mainly electrostatic, and Fe(phen) shows a more effective binding to DNA than the two bipyridyl complexes, possibly owing to a different binding mode. The interactions are enantioselective, leading to a Pfeiffer shift in the diastereomeric inversion equilibria and an excess of the Δ‐enantiomer of Fe(phen) and Fe(bipy) , which is directly monitorable through CD. The partition constants for the inversion equilibrium range from 1.3 to 2.0 for Fe(bipy) and Fe(phen) , depending on ionic conditions. From flow LD information about the orientation of the complexes on DNA was obtained: it is consistent with a fit of the Δ‐enantiomer in the major groove of the right‐handed DNA helix. The mechanisms of interaction are discussed against equilibrium, spectroscopic, and kinetic data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Härd et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: