Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An interesting comparative case study on thermomechanical cycles including programming, cooling, unloading and heating to trigger the 1WE was done using Veriflex® at 62°C (T < Tg close to and below 5°C of Tg) and also at 72°C (T > Tg, close to and above 5°C of Tg) for slightly low strains (ϵm = 70%) and the recovery time of 10 min. Accumulation of strain was estimated during the thermomechanical treatments for using both 70% strains at 62°C (T < Tg), as well as at 72°C (T > Tg). Recovery ratios for 70% strains at 62°C (T < Tg), as well as for 72°C (T > Tg) were also estimated. It turns out that programming, cooling, unloading and heating to trigger the 1WE causes an increase of irreversible strain and is associated with a corresponding decrease of the intensity of the 1WE, in particular, during the first thermomechanical cycles. A LSCM (Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopic) study shows very little change in surface structure which evolved during cycling up to 70% strains at 72°C (T > Tg).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: