Why the study?
Does transradial access improve safety outcomes compared to transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Observational (n=2,845)
No
Does transradial access improve safety outcomes compared to transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transitioning to default transradial access for PCI is safe, reducing bleeding complications and hospital stay without increasing mortality or procedure times.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldalati et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary interventions (n=2,845). Transradial access (TRA) vs. Transfemoral access was evaluated on Safety profile (blood transfusion requirements, incidence of hematoma, hospital length of stay, mortality).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: