Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introducing disorder in the superconducting materials has been considered promising to enhance the electromagnetic impedance and realize noise-resilient superconducting qubits. Despite a number of pioneering implementations, the understanding of the correlation between the material disorder and the qubit coherence is still developing. Here, we demonstrate a systematic characterization of fluxonium qubits with the superinductors made by spinodal titanium-aluminum-nitride with varied disorder. From qubit noise spectroscopy, the flux noise and the dielectric loss are extracted as a measure of the coherence properties. Our results reveal that the 1/f α flux noise dominates the qubit decoherence around the flux-frustration point, strongly correlated with the material disorder; while the dielectric loss are largely similar under a wide range of material properties. From the flux-noise amplitudes, the areal density (σ) of the phenomenological spin defects and material disorder are found to be approximately correlated by σ ∝ ρ ₓₓ³ , or effectively (kFl)⁻³ . This work has provided new insights on the origin of decoherence channels beyond surface defects and within the superconductors, and could serve as a useful guideline for material design and optimization. Disorder has emerged as a promising tool to manipulate properties of superconducting circuits. Here the authors demonstrate the use of disordered spinodal superconductor for fluxonium qubit fabrication and reveal an interesting correlation between the material disorder and the 1/f-type flux noise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: