This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose To evaluate and contrast the effectiveness and safety of two conbercept treatment protocols—a three-dose treat-and-extend (3+T&E) regimen and a three-dose pro re nata (3+PRN) regimen—in Chinese patients diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).Methods Eligible patients, who had not undergone anti-VEGF intraocular injections within 3 months prior to enrollment, were randomly assigned to either the 3+T&E or 3+PRN regimen. The 3+T&E group received at least three monthly injections, with subsequent visit intervals extended based on disease activity assessment. The primary endpoint was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 48, using a predefined noninferiority threshold.Results Among 501 participants (249 in 3+T&E, 252 in 3+PRN), approximately half had prior anti-VEGF treatment. At 48 weeks, both regimens showed significant BCVA improvements (+9.9 for 3+PRN, +8.6 for 3+T&E; p = .208), with comparable rates of ≥15-letter gains (32.12% for 3+PRN, 30.77% for 3+T&E; p = .827). The 3+PRN group received fewer injections (mean 6.4 vs. 6.9 in 3+T&E; p = .028) but had shorter intervals between injections (6.93 weeks vs. 7.46 weeks in 3+T&E; p = .010). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 5% of patients, with ocular events evenly distributed and minimal cardiovascular events reported.Conclusion Both 3+T&E and 3+PRN conbercept regimens effectively improved visual and anatomical outcomes in Chinese nAMD patients. The 3+T&E regimen was noninferior to 3+PRN in improving BCVA from baseline to week 48. The 3+T&E regimen enabled longer injection intervals while 3+PRN regimen with less injections is more cost-effective while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Treatment plan tailored to an individual patient’s situation appears necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: