Deep buccal cavities were cut in 72 incisors and canines in six young monkeys. The cavities were restored as follows: Group One: acid etching of the enamel followed by an intermediate layer of unfilled resin and a light-cured microfilled composite. Group Two: acid etching of the enamel followed by treatment of the dentin with Gluma Cleanser and Gluma Bond. The cavities were restored as in Group One. Group Three: same procedure as in Group Two except for application of a calcium hydroxide cement on the pulpal wall prior to acid etching. Pulp reactions, presence and location of bacteria were studied after 8 and 90 days. A significant association between presence of bacteria and moderate to severe inflammatory reactions were observed. Bacteria were only found in a very few cavities pretreated with Gluma Dentin Bond. In general, slight inflammatory changes prevailed in Groups Two and Three. When the pulpal wall was extremely thin a toxic effect of Gluma Dentin Bond was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Preben Hørsted‐Bindslev (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: