PURPOSE: To assess the functional and ocular surface anti-inflammatory outcomes of epithelium-off accelerated corneal cross-linking (ACXL) in adolescents with progressive keratoconus associated with allergic ocular surface disease and dry eye disease (DED) characterized by elevated tear matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) concentrations. METHODS: Prospective interventional case series of 30 eyes from 15 patients (mean age 16.41 ± 2.36 years; Krumeich stage II) undergoing epi-off ACXL. Outcomes at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), maximum keratometry (Kmax), minimum corneal thickness (MCT), computerized non-invasive tear break-up time (cBUT), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and tear MMP-9 (point-of-care test). In vivo qualitative confocal microscopy (IVCM) investigation provided supportive imaging. Paired t-tests were used and results reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: CDVA improved to 0.09 logMAR at 12 months (≈ 0.81 decimal; 95% CI: 0.10-0.08 logMAR; P < 0.001). Kmax decreased from 55.00 to 53.75 D (95% CI: 53.55-53.95 D; Δ = - 1.25 D; P < 0.001), indicating ectasia stabilization. cBUT increased from 10.11 to 14.41 s (95% CI: 14.11-14.71; P < 0.01). OSDI decreased to 12.15 (95% CI: 11.65-12.65). Tear MMP-9 levels diminished from 64.79 to 16.15 ng/mL (P < 0.0001) and the proportion < 38.6 ng/mL reached 86.7% of the study cohort at 12 months. IVCM documented disappearance of inflammatory infiltrates. No postoperative persistent adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Epi-off ACXL stabilized ectasia, improving visual and ocular surface outcomes, markedly lowering tear MMP-9 levels. Although exploratory, these findings are consistent with a potential ocular surface anti-inflammatory and neuromodulatory role of ACXL, meriting validation in studies involving inflammatory DED beyond keratoconus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazzotta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: