Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper theoretically and experimentally investigates frequency-tuned and impedance-tuned wireless non-radiative power-transfer (WNPT) systems. Closed-form expressions for the efficiencies of both types of systems are presented as functions of frequency and system (circuit) parameters. In the frequency-tuned system, the operating frequency is adjusted to compensate for changes in mutual inductance that occur for variations of transmitter and receiver loop positions. Frequency-tuning is employed for a range of distances over which the loops are strongly coupled. In contrast, the impedance-tuned system employs varactor-based matching networks to compensate for changes in mutual inductance, and to achieve a simultaneous conjugate impedance match over a range of distances. The frequency-tuned system is simpler to implement, while the impedance-tuned system is more complex, but can achieve higher efficiencies. Both of the experimental wireless non-radiative power-transfer systems studied employ resonant shielded loops as transmitting and receiving devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heebl et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: